<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Dispute Cases on OpenChain KWG</title><link>https://OpenChain-Project.github.io/OpenChain-KWG/en/tags/dispute-cases/</link><description>Recent content in Dispute Cases on OpenChain KWG</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 11:20:08 +0900</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://OpenChain-Project.github.io/OpenChain-KWG/en/tags/dispute-cases/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Rockchip and FFmpeg: A License Dispute Case Study</title><link>https://OpenChain-Project.github.io/OpenChain-KWG/en/blog/2026/02/20/ffmpeg/</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://OpenChain-Project.github.io/OpenChain-KWG/en/blog/2026/02/20/ffmpeg/</guid><description>&lt;div class="alert alert-info" role="alert"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article was written using Claude Code, and the key facts cited were cross-verified against primary sources.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="alert alert-warning" role="alert"&gt;&lt;div class="h4 alert-heading" role="heading"&gt;Notice&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article reflects the author&amp;rsquo;s personal analysis and summary, and does not constitute legal advice. The facts cited have been verified based on publicly available sources, but legal determinations such as whether infringement has occurred are matters that can be disputed, so please have specific matters reviewed by an attorney or other expert.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The AVM Lawsuit: Revisiting LGPL-2.1 User Rights and the Obligation to Provide Installation Information</title><link>https://OpenChain-Project.github.io/OpenChain-KWG/en/blog/2025/01/13/lgpl-avm/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://OpenChain-Project.github.io/OpenChain-KWG/en/blog/2025/01/13/lgpl-avm/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This post is based on Ars Technica&amp;rsquo;s article &lt;a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/01/suing-wi-fi-router-makers-remains-a-necessary-part-of-open-source-license-law/"&gt;&amp;ldquo;German router maker is latest company to inadvertently clarify the LGPL license&amp;rdquo;&lt;/a&gt;. The article covers the details of the lawsuit between AVM and Sebastian Steck and the importance of LGPL license compliance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;h2 id="1-case-overview"&gt;1. Case Overview&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On January 9, 2025, the Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC) &lt;a href="https://sfconservancy.org/news/2025/jan/09/avm-copyleft-lawsuit-resolved-with-install/"&gt;announced&lt;/a&gt; that the lawsuit it had filed against AVM, a German network equipment manufacturer, had concluded. The core of this lawsuit concerned the rights of users specified in the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) version 2.1, particularly the obligation to provide installation information.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>To Mine or Not To Mine: A German Court's Ruling on the Copyright Dilemma of the AI Era</title><link>https://OpenChain-Project.github.io/OpenChain-KWG/en/blog/2024/11/06/germany-ai-lawsuit/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://OpenChain-Project.github.io/OpenChain-KWG/en/blog/2024/11/06/germany-ai-lawsuit/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This post is based on JBB Rechtsanwält:innen&amp;rsquo;s blog post &amp;ldquo;To Mine or Not To Mine&amp;rdquo; (&lt;a href="https://jbb.de/to-mine-or-not-to-mine/"&gt;https://jbb.de/to-mine-or-not-to-mine/&lt;/a&gt;) and is published to explain a recent German court ruling on text and data mining (TDM) and to share related knowledge.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please note that I am not a legal professional, and this content cannot serve as a legal basis. For specific situations related to license and legal issues, please be sure to seek advice from a legal professional.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Chinese Copyright Infringement Case: "Since GPL-Based Software Products Already Have an Obligation to Disclose Source Anyway, Isn't It Fine to Copy Them?"</title><link>https://OpenChain-Project.github.io/OpenChain-KWG/en/blog/2024/09/23/gpl-openwrt/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://OpenChain-Project.github.io/OpenChain-KWG/en/blog/2024/09/23/gpl-openwrt/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As the use of open source software has spread widely, the legal issues surrounding it have grown increasingly complex. In particular, the question of copyright over derivative works based on open source projects that use a copyleft license such as GPL (GNU General Public License) is a thorny subject for many companies. A recent software copyright infringement lawsuit in China offers important implications for this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="parties-to-the-lawsuit"&gt;Parties to the Lawsuit&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Plaintiff: Wangjing Technology (Wangjing)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Defendants:
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Yibang Communication Technology (Yibang)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Qi&amp;rsquo;ao Network Technology (Qi&amp;rsquo;ao)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;and three individuals (Liu, Wu, Xie)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;h2 id="overview-of-the-case"&gt;Overview of the Case&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 2009, Wangjing developed a converged communication smart gateway product called &amp;ldquo;OfficeTen.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>French Court Orders Major Telecom Orange to Pay Damages for GPL Violation</title><link>https://OpenChain-Project.github.io/OpenChain-KWG/en/blog/2024/02/19/orange-lasso/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://OpenChain-Project.github.io/OpenChain-KWG/en/blog/2024/02/19/orange-lasso/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Today I want to look at a case in which a French court ordered the telecom company Orange to pay damages for violating the GPL. This case seemed especially worth noting for two main reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;First, the defendant in this case is Orange, a major telecom operator. (Since I work at a telecom operator myself&amp;hellip;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Second, while GPL violation lawsuits mostly arise in embedded devices, in this case the open source at issue was used to build a B2B web service. This underscores that open source license compliance matters across every area of software development.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Through these aspects, this case looks set to reaffirm the importance of open source license compliance. It stands as an important example emphasizing that companies must thoroughly understand and comply with license requirements when using open source.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>China's First GPL Lawsuit Case: VirtualApp</title><link>https://OpenChain-Project.github.io/OpenChain-KWG/en/blog/2021/11/15/virtualapp-gpl/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://OpenChain-Project.github.io/OpenChain-KWG/en/blog/2021/11/15/virtualapp-gpl/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Hello, this is Haksung Jang.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In September 2021, it was reported through a &lt;a href="https://www.oschina.net/news/159435"&gt;Chinese news article&lt;/a&gt; that the first GPL-related ruling in China had been handed down. I&amp;rsquo;ve summarized what I understood of it using a translation tool.
Please keep in mind that, since I&amp;rsquo;m not a lawyer and don&amp;rsquo;t know Chinese, there may be errors in the content. :)
If you find any errors, I&amp;rsquo;d be grateful if you&amp;rsquo;d let me know at any time (&lt;a href="mailto:haksung@sk.com"&gt;haksung@sk.com&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>