<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Oracle v. Rimini on OpenChain KWG</title><link>https://OpenChain-Project.github.io/OpenChain-KWG/en/tags/oracle-v.-rimini/</link><description>Recent content in Oracle v. Rimini on OpenChain KWG</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 11:20:08 +0900</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://OpenChain-Project.github.io/OpenChain-KWG/en/tags/oracle-v.-rimini/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>What the Oracle v. Rimini Street Case Tells Us About the Scope of GPL Derivative Works</title><link>https://OpenChain-Project.github.io/OpenChain-KWG/en/blog/2024/12/23/oracle-rimini/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://OpenChain-Project.github.io/OpenChain-KWG/en/blog/2024/12/23/oracle-rimini/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="introduction"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In disputes over software intellectual property infringement, the concept of &amp;ldquo;derivative works&amp;rdquo; is critically important. This concept becomes a central issue especially when dealing with open source licenses such as the &lt;a href="https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html"&gt;GNU General Public License (GPL)&lt;/a&gt;. The recent litigation between &lt;a href="https://www.oracle.com/"&gt;Oracle&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://www.riministreet.com/"&gt;Rimini Street&lt;/a&gt; has drawn renewed attention to the legal interpretation of what counts as a derivative work. This article looks at the background of the case, the key rulings, and the implications for open source licensing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>